Australian journalist Avani Dias recently faced challenges in India when her journalist visa was not extended until the last moment, leading her to leave the country. Indian officials cited her report on the killing of Canadian Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar as the reason for their actions, further highlighting the political tensions surrounding foreign journalists in the country.
Dias encountered difficulties obtaining accreditation to cover India’s general elections, which commenced on April 19. Despite Australian intervention resulting in a two-month visa extension, she found the environment challenging for her work and eventually departed. This incident adds to the growing concerns raised by over 30 foreign correspondents in India, who have highlighted increased visa restrictions and threats faced by journalists like French journalist Vanessa Dougnac, who left India after alleged government pressure.
The lack of public statements by the Australian government on Dias’ case and broader human rights issues in India underscores the limitations of “quiet diplomacy” in addressing political obstacles faced by foreign nationals. As the situation persists, it becomes evident that remaining silent on rights issues does not shield individuals from politically motivated abuses, emphasizing the need for greater international attention and advocacy.